Now, my dear fellow, this brings up a question of whether or not people want these additional RPCs, and if they will use them. It is already quite hard, from my personal experience, having a well-fleshed out character, and much harder keeping track of all your RPC's actions. I fear this might cause a shift in the quality of the RP, but if people can manage so much, then I shall accept. Enregistrer
Personally I'm ok with 4 RPC's these complaints came from The J & TheFirstDecade
Eh, if they want some more stuff, let them have it. We'll intervene if it gets out of hand. I hope we don't need to.
Now, my dear fellow, this brings up a question of whether or not people want these additional RPCs, and if they will use them. It is already quite hard, from my personal experience, having a well-fleshed out character, and much harder keeping track of all your RPC's actions. I fear this might cause a shift in the quality of the RP, but if people can manage so much, then I shall accept. Enregistrer
Personally I'm ok with 4 RPC's these complaints came from The J & TheFirstDecade
...oh come on, man... you had to judge the RPC limit, bruh?!
You know I replaced Brimstone to get this position in FAC, since Torah is gone we need a replacement for him too.
I'll do it.
The FAC will vote on who twill replace Torahvision as the 4th FAC member, sorta like how I was chosen, can Shamrock and FelipeDutra please elect who they wish to serve on the FAC then I will decide,
The FAC will vote on who twill replace Torahvision as the 4th FAC member, sorta like how I was chosen, can Shamrock and FelipeDutra please elect who they wish to serve on the FAC then I will decide,
The FAC will vote on who twill replace Torahvision as the 4th FAC member, sorta like how I was chosen, can Shamrock and FelipeDutra please elect who they wish to serve on the FAC then I will decide,
The FAC will vote on who twill replace Torahvision as the 4th FAC member, sorta like how I was chosen, can Shamrock and FelipeDutra please elect who they wish to serve on the FAC then I will decide,
I suggest not having a fourth member. FACs are supposed to have an odd number (normally three) of members, to avoid ties in votes. Having four raises complications.
If we are to have four members, however, my vote lies with LegoBuilder.
The FAC will vote on who twill replace Torahvision as the 4th FAC member, sorta like how I was chosen, can Shamrock and FelipeDutra please elect who they wish to serve on the FAC then I will decide,
I suggest not having a fourth member. FACs are supposed to have an odd number (normally three) of members, to avoid ties in votes. Having four raises complications.
If we are to have four members, however, my vote lies with LegoBuilder.
I understand, I don't think we should have 4 people, because of the problem we had last time.
I suggest not having a fourth member. FACs are supposed to have an odd number (normally three) of members, to avoid ties in votes. Having four raises complications.
If we are to have four members, however, my vote lies with LegoBuilder.
I understand, I don't think we should have 4 people, because of the problem we had last time.
FelipeDutraShamrock Hey FAC, over on the main Chima board a lot of us have been discussing a Fanon Chima Roleplay, because we want to make custom tribes of other animals that aren't in official Chima. The mods won't give us another forum no matter what, so could I make a single topic on this forum that could be the Fanon RP? It would be a separate universe from the main Chima RP, and we could have all our Fanon RP stuff contained in that topic.
what do you mean by that? 
![[by]](http://storage.proboards.com/6672327/images/HvTKHVXzvOKNQeJYoKPy.png)
