|
Post by Deleted on Jan 7, 2018 18:09:18 GMT
Well it would be a inconvinence to moderators as they'd have to edit the post in order to see what it says.
|
|
|
Post by jedimasterwolf on Jan 7, 2018 22:51:23 GMT
Ha, was that a reference to the Jedi Temple? New padawans, go to page 3 and read JediMasterWolf's jammers, then come back, do the trial, and yay! XD
I do not know yet about this.... as much as that would be crucial to keeping secrets..... it would also get out of hand with the name pointing.... Also, what if someone just makes an account with the same name to open it? Couldn't someone just make a "JediMasterWolf" account and open mine?
It was. XD
Proboards doesn't let that happen - it tells you that the username is unavailable. And there are no ways to get around that then? That is perfect. Wish you could make groups though.
Old MBs: Captain Lachlan, Mirkwood Elf 3rd-in-command in LOTR RP; Captain Cuyler of the Black Pearl in Classics RP; Asger and Yaegar in Ninjago RP; Captain Ake of the Merchant of Death in Pirates RP; "Lucky 13" in City RP; Ake in TMNT RP; Radford the Biker in T.A.D.A.L. RP; Sir Hagan of Rivenden in Castle RP; founder and Grandmaster Volksven of the New (RP) Jedi Order
|
|
|
Post by Jonmbost on Jan 8, 2018 1:22:03 GMT
I believe that this would be a good idea, but we need some clarification: would we still have jammers? If this is replacing jammers, I'd say no, but if we have both I'd say yes. Jammers would stay yes. Good. Then I'll vote yes.
|
|
|
Post by Jonmbost on Jan 8, 2018 2:45:48 GMT
I believe that this would be a good idea, but we need some clarification: would we still have jammers? If this is replacing jammers, I'd say no, but if we have both I'd say yes. You'd have both. Jammers are an ingrained part of LMB culture, which we will not be removing. Good! Then I fully support these "whisper tags."
|
|
|
Post by Jonmbost on Jan 8, 2018 2:47:00 GMT
Well it would be a inconvinence to moderators as they'd have to edit the post in order to see what it says. They could always remove it afterwards. Sam said that there was a way to moderate it, though.
|
|
|
Post by Shamrock on Jan 8, 2018 11:39:35 GMT
It was. XD
Proboards doesn't let that happen - it tells you that the username is unavailable. And there are no ways to get around that then? That is perfect. Wish you could make groups though.
No, there's no way around it. You can do groups by typing in the names of everyone, but unfortunately, you can't do something like "Jedi only!", no.
I drink tea.
|
|
|
Post by Judah on Jan 8, 2018 19:13:47 GMT
These would come in handy for very secret things, but the slightest slip-up may jeopardize the mission, and long lists of names would be hazardous. But I'll vote yes, for those small orders to underlings that could change the course of time itself.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 8, 2018 22:04:54 GMT
Well it would be a inconvinence to moderators as they'd have to edit the post in order to see what it says. They could always remove it afterwards. Sam said that there was a way to moderate it, though. By pressing "edit", you could see the whisper.
|
|
|
Post by Jonmbost on Jan 9, 2018 1:39:30 GMT
They could always remove it afterwards. Sam said that there was a way to moderate it, though. By pressing "edit", you could see the whisper. So they'd have to moderate it first?
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 9, 2018 21:55:08 GMT
By pressing "edit", you could see the whisper. So they'd have to moderate it first? Yes and it's inconvinent!
|
|
|
Post by Sweets on Jan 9, 2018 22:03:15 GMT
i disagree because i love opening jammers that arent meant for me
this could also be a possibly gateway to unwanted gossip or talk of another person without their knowledge. nuh uh
|
|
|
Post by Sweets on Jan 9, 2018 22:04:14 GMT
The mods would be moderating the whisper tags though. I don't think they'd allow anyone to gossip about anyone else. I don't think we can moderate them. That's why I'm against them. thats a really bad idea to have unmoderated one on one tags. it seems very dodgy
|
|
|
Post by Jonmbost on Jan 10, 2018 1:47:20 GMT
i disagree because i love opening jammers that arent meant for me
this could also be a possibly gateway to unwanted gossip or talk of another person without their knowledge. nuh uh Well, moderators would still moderate them.
|
|
|
Post by Jonmbost on Jan 10, 2018 1:47:39 GMT
So they'd have to moderate it first? Yes and it's inconvinent! Well, if the moderators think that they'll be able to do it, then sure.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 10, 2018 2:10:06 GMT
Yes and it's inconvinent! Well, if the moderators think that they'll be able to do it, then sure. In the beginning of this site's life span they tried whispers and didn't like it.
|
|