OOC: You have good points... but decade is right... we need to stop losing people... please don't leave =( I along with Legobuilder voted for far future that because of the weapons that were being made did not fit in with any other category... You should still be able to reject unreasonable things like robots and such... I don't want robots, spaceships or anything that is like that... we can't keep losing people though... Torah, Matthews, Drake, and now Lego... don't leave as well...
OOC: Hmmm...yes, I can reject some stuff...but not everything. Look at the machine gun currently being looked at. If it were up to me, I'd reject it. However, I can no longer reasonably do so.
OOC: Shouldn't an FAC member still be able to reject stuff if they decide it should be rejected?
I always thought we shouldn't have introduced missiles...
That was probably a bad idea.
I tried not to use them much after they were introduced, but sometimes I couldn't resist. Luckily though, missiles are going to become useless and void when fire vs ice starts, because they wouldn't benefit or endanger either element.
OOC: Hmmm...yes, I can reject some stuff...but not everything. Look at the machine gun currently being looked at. If it were up to me, I'd reject it. However, I can no longer reasonably do so.
OOC: Shouldn't an FAC member still be able to reject stuff if they decide it should be rejected?
OOC: I can, but people will say they need the weapon to pierce modern armour. If I reject modern armour, people will say that it should be allowed because of the tech period.
I tried not to use them much after they were introduced, but sometimes I couldn't resist. Luckily though, missiles are going to become useless and void when fire vs ice starts, because they wouldn't benefit or endanger either element.
I tried not to use them much after they were introduced, but sometimes I couldn't resist. Luckily though, missiles are going to become useless and void when fire vs ice starts, because they wouldn't benefit or endanger either element.
OOC: Shouldn't an FAC member still be able to reject stuff if they decide it should be rejected?
OOC: I can, but people will say they need the weapon to pierce modern armour. If I reject modern armour, people will say that it should be allowed because of the tech period.
OOC: Shouldn't an FAC member still be able to reject stuff if they decide it should be rejected?
OOC: I can, but people will say they need the weapon to pierce modern armour. If I reject modern armour, people will say that it should be allowed because of the tech period.
*Quietly withdraws weapon proposition since it's overkill anyways.*
OOC: I can, but people will say they need the weapon to pierce modern armour. If I reject modern armour, people will say that it should be allowed because of the tech period.
*Quietly withdraws weapon proposition since it's overkill anyways.*
I tried not to use them much after they were introduced, but sometimes I couldn't resist. Luckily though, missiles are going to become useless and void when fire vs ice starts, because they wouldn't benefit or endanger either element.
Explosions will melt ice, and fire tribe stuff isn't made of fire so therefore it will be damaged.
OOC: I can, but people will say they need the weapon to pierce modern armour. If I reject modern armour, people will say that it should be allowed because of the tech period.
*Quietly withdraws weapon proposition since it's overkill anyways.*
Sorry.
Don't be. There's nothing wrong with it in particular; I'm just using it as an example of what will likely flood the FAC soon.
No. It made sense for Scorm to exist in this RP as the scorpion king, but if we start putting a bunch of canon characters in like Sir Fangar, Laval, or Crominus, it'll stop being a Roleplay and just become a reboot of the TV show.
