Ah. I hate it when they do that type of thing. That's why subtitles are always better than dubbing... The story is as close as possible to the actual one.
Well, I saw the movie. I can see why you forgot about it, it's a weirdly forgettable movie. Not the worst monster movie I've seen, but the human scenes were mostly uninteresting, and I almost fell asleep during a couple of them. The monster fights were fun though!
Ay. The human scenes I forget totally, which is probably because they were uninteresting, but the fight scenes are always fun in these films. Which Kaiju film had the best fight, would you say?
I'd be in agreement with that... I think Rey will end up being the Chosen One, but I'd prefer it be Luke or Anakin. Though the trailer 'hint', if it indeed is one, could point to Luke as well.
Which trailer hint? There were several things....
The one I mentioned before where they talked about balance.
Ooooh. That'd be really cool. You could do all sorts of Underworld stuff in it. I'll read up on her really quick and get back to you if you want a random string of ideas. Any development on the plot at all, or just know that she's the character you want?
Not much development, really. Somebody wrote a short story about her, but that just covers a small mission. I think there's a guy in that I can use as a sidekick, and she's got a ship! Very exciting!
Yes, it definitely could be. I'll see if I can find the short story online and read it. Anything in particular you would like ideas on? Setting, characters, etc?
Skywalker. I don't want it to happen, but I'd be surprised if it weren't the case. The one theory I really like about her identity is the Rey Palpatine one. It'd be interesting to me.
No one... I don't think we'll find out he's related to anyone of importance. I really think that all we'll get about his backstory is what they said in TFA.
I would really, really like it if he was Plagueis, but I think he's just someone new.
No, please no. He really shouldn't, as much as I would've liked one last seen with Leia, Luke and Han together.
lol okay. I personally believe she is a Skywalker, Solo is not beyond possibility, though. Daisy Ridley said she thought Rey's identity very obvious..and yes, Skywalker is plainly obvious. It would be pretty cool.
Yah. I don't think Finn is anybody..some people go a little crazy with theories.
I have a couple theories..he could be Plagueis...or, he could be Vader's apprentice in Rogue One. Now THAT would be cool.
Yah, it would probably be tacky...but I really wouldn't be surprised.
I'm still not fond of the idea... It's TOO obvious to me. If you're teasing a reveal for two years in between films, just to make it the obvious one, it'd be disappointing. I DEFINITLELY do not want Rey Kenobi, though.
Mhm. Plus it'd be too coincidental, and kinda take away from the character a bit, IMO, if he discovered his family's identity. One of his most interesting aspects is that he was taken from them and never got to know them. Finn's a really underrated character, too... Everyone was talking about Kylo and Rey after TFA, but Finn's really cool.
Oh, you mean the kneeling down guy... It's possible, but I doubt it. According to a reliable source, Snoke is around 8 or 9 feet tall, which would rule out a human. Also, we know he's been active in the Force for a very long time, which also makes me think he's not human. I really, really like the idea of Plagueis, but I think they confirmed its not him.
I honestly would... I don't foresee Han coming back. I think that was Ford's last SW film.
{JAMMERS! -Ant-Maniac- ONLY!}I'm pretty sure you've read my jammers I've addressed to Stephanie. I never said outside of Jammers that I'm Catholic, but you somehow know.
It's no big deal, I just wanted to let you know i totally caught it because hardly anything gets past me.
{JAMMERS! -Blade Caster- ONLY!} Actually, I didn't. You just kept referring to Paul as St. Paul, and made references to Catholic teaching of Oral Tradition. It was fairly obvious if one knows anything about Catholicism. Though I have looked in jammers in the past, so it's not exactly an unreasonable accusation.
Sure, Star Wars politics! I agree about the Separatists, but considering they were doing illegal things after spilitting off, I understand why the Republic was against them. Also, I thunk the Old Republic should have done some stuff to stop slavery in the Outer Rim.
I knew that one was.
Yep.
I think the question is, though, are those things really illegal for them. If they're no longer part of the Republic, then they don't have to follow Republic law. That's like expecting France to follow American law. That's true. I believe slavery was illegal in the Old Republic, but they could've enforced it better.
Oh.
More like expecting America to follow Britain's laws, because we broke off of Britain to become our own country.
The Old Republic had a lot of flaws.
Ignore everything I say, to the best of your ability.
I hope they reveal it in Episode VIII or IX, but if not, they'll probably end up doing it in a comic or something. Maybe she's a clone of someone? And no one in the First Order knows about the garbage chute.
"All is as the Force WHILLS it" xD. I agree on what Luke wants to do.
Ooh, a video game. I would want that if it was for a system I actually own (or would be willing to get).
All those sound cool, but I doubt all that will happen in one movie.
But it comes from Banthas. And Banthas aren't blue, last I checked.
I guess so.
I hope so, too... I don't think she'll end up being a clone of anyone, though, because no one else fits her description, plus Gwendoline Christie is like 6 feet 3 inches tall, and there really isn't any other women in Star Wars that height. I was mostly referring to her reputation with the fans. Now she's kind of known for being that Stormtrooper commander who lowered the shield of Starkiller Base because she was a coward and then was dumped in the trash.
I understood that reference.
As would I! But I still think that the more likely possibility is in a cartoon, as they did with Maul. It's probably a bit too big of a thing for a comic or video game.
Eh, a lot of it will, anyway. What do you think the chances we see Jabba are?
Oh. Well, maybe it's just blue because of the Bantha digestive system?
What do you think we'll learn about Snoke?
Yeah, you're probably right. I think a cyborg would be a possibility though.
I assumed so.
WHEN (not if) Disney gets around to making a Netflix live-action Star Wars show, I think a show about Boba Fett and other bounty hunters would be a good choice.
Pretty high, actually. Maybe we'll see exactly why Jabba got mad at him.
I actually don't want to have a serious discussion about blue milk. I was just playing off of the "Why is the sky blue?" question.
Ignore everything I say, to the best of your ability.
I'm the same way with writing. I even started a Star Wars story on the old MBs and never finished it. I want to push myself to write more this summer, I have ideas besides Star Wars ones as well. Original stories, and even monster movie ideas.
Alright, here's one thing I need help with, but I don't want to share too much:
{JAMMERS! -Ant-Maniac- ONLY!}I want some character to be a clone of an existing character, without them knowing it, and have to come to terms with that. Howeverc I don't know who they should be a clone of, without it being too weird or forced.
That's the main thing I need help with right now. I have character ideas and I'm brainstorming for the plot.
It's a good concept though.
I'm pretty much exactly the same on all those counts, except I don't have any monster movie ideas. I'd love to hear yours sometime, or I'll read it if you decide to translate it to a story for the LMBs.
{JAMMERS! -BrianG2402- ONLY!}That's a cool idea... I'm guessing you probably don't want me to take the easy way out and say 'Jango Fett.' So, maybe some Jedi that fell in battle, which the Kaminoans decided to clone, as they wanted to see what would happen with a force sensitive subject? Or maybe, and this might just be because I love the character and he's really underused, Count Dooku? Maybe a radical Rebel group somehow acquired his remains after the battle over Coruscant at the end of the Clone Wars and cloned it from them in an attempt to make someone who could take on the Empire after the fall of the Jedi.
I don't think a monster movie story really relates to LEGO, but if I get around to really writing one, I'll share it with you somehow.
{JAMMERS! -Ant-Maniac- ONLY!}Oh, Dooku is a good idea. I had been tossing around Qui-Gon and Mace Windu but that is probably better. It would be less obvious, for one thing, considering we never saw a young Dooku. And your origin story sounds dang cool, that sounds like something Saw Gerrera would do! I mean, he knew about Dooku, maybe he found his remains and cloned him in secret. Maube not Kaminoans though, because they are called "the best cloners in the galaxy" which implies that there are others. Good ideas!
Ignore everything I say, to the best of your ability.
Well, I saw the movie. I can see why you forgot about it, it's a weirdly forgettable movie. Not the worst monster movie I've seen, but the human scenes were mostly uninteresting, and I almost fell asleep during a couple of them. The monster fights were fun though!
Ay. The human scenes I forget totally, which is probably because they were uninteresting, but the fight scenes are always fun in these films. Which Kaiju film had the best fight, would you say?
That depends on what you look for in a fight. If you want a ton of monsters duking it out, I'd say Destroy All Monsters. If you want a hilarious cheesy fight with ridiculous fighting movies, go see Godzilla vs. Megalon. If you want something that is genuinely cool and pretty epic, I'd recommend Godzilla vs. King Ghidorah.
But Mothra vs. Godzilla (1964), not to be confused with Godzilla vs. Mothra (1992) is probably the best Godzilla movie besides the original and Gareth Edwards'. It's fun, with an actually interesting human plot, and some dang cool monster scenes.
Ignore everything I say, to the best of your ability.
Well.....I don't know HOW Roman Catholics could've proven Protestants wrong. That one is past me... BTW, could you please reply to our religious discussion?
I already did, but it got stuck in moderation so I'll have to repost or something.
He wasn't disgusted with holidays in general, he was disgusted with the Galatians for celebrating the wrong holidays.
And nobody reading the Bible would have thought of Easter if it weren't for the pagan holidays. They mixed all the pagan holidays and made them "Christian". The first Sunday after the first full moon after the Spring Equinox? Ever wondered where that came from? Or the ideas of eggs and rabbits? They are all pagan things that the Church dubbed "Christian".
Paul says in Galatians that we shouldn't observe holidays and seasons and years. That was done in the old covenant, we don't need to observe those things, holidays, the idea that you could keep a day holy (e.g. the Sabbath) is something from the Old Covenant. And (nothing personal here) but Roman Catholics have priests and censors and vestments and all of these things, which were things of the Old Covenant.
Another thing. 2 Timothy 3:16-17. We don't need to add things, Paul says everything we need to know is in the Scriptures.
Actually, those are pagan ideas, but the Church does not celebrate Easter the pagan way, we celebrate Christ's triumph over sin and death, the greatest miracle of all: the Resurrection. People have been saying that 'Easter' should be called 'Resurrection Day' instead, but too many people call it Easter to change it.
Censors and vestments? God commanded us to use vestments in Exodus 28:2: "For your brother Aaron you will make sacred vestments to give dignity and magnificence. You will instruct all the skilled men, whom I have endowed with skill, to make Aaron's vestments for his consecration to my priesthood. These are the vestments which they must make: a pectoral, an ephod, a robe, an embroidered tunic, a turban, and a belt. They must make sacred vestments for your brother Aaron and his sons, for them to be priests in my service. They will use gold and violet material, red-purple and crimson, and finely woven linen." So why don't you have priests that use vestments? God commanded it.
Not everything in the Bible is to be taken literally, the Bible also says to call no man 'teacher', but everyone does that so it must mean something other than the literal interpretation otherwise no one would be called 'teacher'.
If you want to interpret Galatians literally I can't stop you. 2 Timothy 3:16-17 says: "All scripture, inspired of God, is profitable to teach, to reprove, to correct, to instruct in justice," It does not say the Bible contains everything and like I said earlier, there's too much to be contained in the Bible. If you want I can re-post that quote.
Actually, I don't think the mods care about religious discussions here as long as they stay polite because there was one in the History Chat Club for a while, it may still be happening. Keplers was taking a major role in it and he's a mod.
I actually want to stop it as soon as I can because most Protestants will ignore points where they've been proven wrong.
No ad-hominems please.
No assuming please.
You really think I'd do that to Stephanie though? I want to stop the debate in case that happens, I didn't say it would.