I mean, it's a parody of everything Batman and had so many cameos.
I'm surprised it airs outside if the U.S. though. I mean, it's a 50 year old show.
I feel like I saw a clip where they did a quick little portion with his Batman in it... But I might be wrong, and they still should've brought Adam West himself back to do a voice cameo.
These are my thoughts exactly. It's popularity just baffles me. It's one of those things I feel like most people wouldn't care about normally, but think it's the greatest thing ever now because you're SUPPOSED to like it. I mean, maybe I'm wrong, but that's the feeling I get.
Its popularity is really impossible to understand imo. It spins! Amazing!
Yup, but apparently, they treat it like it's a new gadget or something. Same.
I guess that's how all trends work. They make no logical sense, but people do them because other people are doing them. I vaguely remember when I was significantly younger (this might have been before your time, because I BARELY remember it) that the big craze were these rubber bands shaped like animals... Except that when you wore them on your wrist, as you were supposed to for whatever reason, the shape got distorted. Needless to say, I didn't fall into that trend either.
Yeah, but the thing about Scripture is that even with that it's hard to prove yourself right or someone else wrong. SO MUCH of scripture is symbolic, and also SO MUCH is not symbolic, and everything has layered meaning. The problem is, what I take as literal and not symbolic as a Catholic, you often take as symbolic and not literal as a Protestant, and vice versa. It's not always that people just aren't willing to change, it's just that even though we both believe in the Bible, we think if it in different ways. So when I'm saying "In the Bible it says 'X', so therefore 'X' is true and you're wrong.", you could say "Oh, but 'X' was just meant symbolically according to how I interpret the Bible, and isn't actually literally true." The question is, how could I prove that the passage is meant literally? Or how could you prove it was meant symbolically? That's the difficulty.
Yes, I do get what you're saying. And that does tend to happen. In that case it would be a question of how to interpret the Bible. I actually don't find it that hard, but it can be. So, if you can get the person to understand how to read it, and how to take the context, it should be fine. But that is the real challenge, if they will accept.
The thing is, for example, in an argument I would say the context you were trying to get me to read something in is the incorrect one, and the one I'm reading it in is already right. And, evidently from the way you said that, you're pretty certain you have the right context and the other person would definitely already have the wrong. So try thinking of it as if you were from their point of view... I was trying to convince you that the context you were reading a certain passage was wrong. It doesn't seem like you'd be willing to budge, no matter what I threw at you, because you're very strong in your convictions. (Not literally throw of course. I can't throw things over the Internet). Who's to say the context you're so certain of, that you're trying to convince me of, is the correct one? Are you one-hundred percent certain YOUR interpretation is correct, and the other would be wrong? Because I think you are certain you're correct, and I know that I am. You might be able to win a religious argument with someone who wasn't terribly religious, but when it comes to someone who is just as strong in different convictions, it comes down to unstoppable force and immovable object. No one is going to budge, and it's not because they're just stubborn or something. It still comes back it being extremely hard to win a religious argument.
{JAMMERS! -same- ONLY!} OKAY. This is hilariously ironic, though. *considers starting new order because Jedi are too corrupt* *changes mind and decides to look the other way when offered power* ((not trying to sway you, I just legitimately found it funny.))
{JAMMERS! -Same- ONLY!} UGH! How can I make you understand. *thinks* I wasn't getting anywhere. I was getting annoyed, left behind. rejected and forgotten. I should've had a Council Seat ages ago, but nobody cared about me that much. But now, I was noticed! And I may just get that council seat! Now, you can join the Jedi, and I'll get you trained and through the Trials in approximately a week. Or you can wait, to see how this goes. The B is troubling me.
Congradulations, this post responding to your 500th post makes me the 9th user with the most posts.
Congrats! That's impressive.
This post responding to the post which makes you the user with the 9th most posts responding to my 500th post is my 509th post, which is just a really cool arbitrary number!
Yes, I do get what you're saying. And that does tend to happen. In that case it would be a question of how to interpret the Bible. I actually don't find it that hard, but it can be. So, if you can get the person to understand how to read it, and how to take the context, it should be fine. But that is the real challenge, if they will accept.
The thing is, for example, in an argument I would say the context you were trying to get me to read something in is the incorrect one, and the one I'm reading it in is already right. And, evidently from the way you said that, you're pretty certain you have the right context and the other person would definitely already have the wrong. So try thinking of it as if you were from their point of view... I was trying to convince you that the context you were reading a certain passage was wrong. It doesn't seem like you'd be willing to budge, no matter what I threw at you, because you're very strong in your convictions. (Not literally throw of course. I can't throw things over the Internet). Who's to say the context you're so certain of, that you're trying to convince me of, is the correct one? Are you one-hundred percent certain YOUR interpretation is correct, and the other would be wrong? Because I think you are certain you're correct, and I know that I am. You might be able to win a religious argument with someone who wasn't terribly religious, but when it comes to someone who is just as strong in different convictions, it comes down to unstoppable force and immovable object. No one is going to budge, and it's not because they're just stubborn or something. It still comes back it being extremely hard to win a religious argument.
True in one sense. However, you need to talk about what's it all about. How a person interprets the Bible depends on what they believe. So a claiming Christian (who actually isn't) would probably have some misunderstood idea of what the Bible is all about. If you understand what the Bible is about, what a Christian is, it isn't hard to understand the Bible. I actually think interpreting the Bible can be pretty easy, just follow it. So, unfortunately, many people twist the Bible to make it say what they want it to say. They try to argue context, what something really means, and try to say it doesn't apply today or it's not being literal. So, yes, it is a matter of faith. But once the person is steered correctly, it is possible to win.
.jpg)
