OOC: not exactly... the minor tribes don't belong to the Raven HQ and they haven't fought for anybody yet... so they could fight for either side if they wanted to...
OOC: What I meant was: Torahvision 's main is the ravens and Shamrock 's main is in the lions. If you lets said chose the lions that means Foltrox couldn't fight/ would have to abandon. If I want to lets say fight the lions I cant because Bismarck is a lion ally.
OOC: oooooooh now i understand... you do have a point there i agree with you then...
Can we terminate some of the rp guidelines? Like the rule which says you cant belong to rivalling HQ's and the one which says you can only fight on one side of the conflict? Because it sorta puts ppl into a box, it forces the Minor tribes to stay neutral, and it forces me unless my other characters become traitors to fight on the side of the Lions.
I agree about getting rid of that rule, because I'm planning on having a scorpion character, a leapord character, and an ice bear character, all of which will probably end up being on different sides.
Can we terminate some of the rp guidelines? Like the rule which says you cant belong to rivalling HQ's and the one which says you can only fight on one side of the conflict? Because it sorta puts ppl into a box, it forces the Minor tribes to stay neutral, and it forces me unless my other characters become traitors to fight on the side of the Lions.
I agree about getting rid of that rule, because I'm planning on having a scorpion character, a leapord character, and an ice bear character, all of which will probably end up being on different sides.
Well, it certainly complicates interaction. We'd really have to stay true to the Tribe and character interests. That rule was implemented so there wouldn't be any bias from RPers when fighting or anything.
I agree about getting rid of that rule, because I'm planning on having a scorpion character, a leapord character, and an ice bear character, all of which will probably end up being on different sides.
Well, it certainly complicates interaction. We'd really have to stay true to the Tribe and character interests. That rule was implemented so there wouldn't be any bias from RPers when fighting or anything.
Yeah, but in this RP it just doesn't work. We have to agree on certain aspects: 1) Our 2 characters wont directly fight one another, and/or another person who is fighting will take control of one of our characters.
I agree about getting rid of that rule, because I'm planning on having a scorpion character, a leapord character, and an ice bear character, all of which will probably end up being on different sides.
Well, it certainly complicates interaction. We'd really have to stay true to the Tribe and character interests. That rule was implemented so there wouldn't be any bias from RPers when fighting or anything.
I think we should be able to be on different sides, but not fight ourselves, if that makes sense.
Well, it certainly complicates interaction. We'd really have to stay true to the Tribe and character interests. That rule was implemented so there wouldn't be any bias from RPers when fighting or anything.
Yeah, but in this RP it just doesn't work. We have to agree on certain aspects: 1) Our 2 characters wont directly fight one another, and/or another person who is fighting will take control of one of our characters.
Or during a battle, 1 of our characters can be fighting NPCs in the background, while our other character would be controlled by us. [i]
Yeah, but in this RP it just doesn't work. We have to agree on certain aspects: 1) Our 2 characters wont directly fight one another, and/or another person who is fighting will take control of one of our characters.
Or during a battle, 1 of our characters can be fighting NPCs in the background, while our other character would be controlled by us. [i]
Another thing, from all the chima rps I have read, everyone always wants to set a currency, and we should to. In other news, I am often here when like there is no staff for 12 hours, should I run for mod ?
Another thing, from all the chima rps I have read, everyone always wants to set a currency, and we should to. In other news, I am often here when like there is no staff for 12 hours, should I run for mod ?
I was going to propose that myself. Thank you.
It makes sense to use Chi itself as a currency, as it is used for a great deal many things, but that in primitive times. As technology and organisation advances, it would make more sense to use printed money, because if there's a war going on, the government won't allow the small child to go buy country with what is precious ammunition and fuel.
Another thing, from all the chima rps I have read, everyone always wants to set a currency, and we should to. In other news, I am often here when like there is no staff for 12 hours, should I run for mod ?
I was going to propose that myself. Thank you.
It makes sense to use Chi itself as a currency, as it is used for a great deal many things, but that in primitive times. As technology and organisation advances, it would make more sense to use printed money, because if there's a war going on, the government won't allow the small child to go buy country with what is precious ammunition and fuel.
I think we should use the € because it looks sorta like a C, for Chima. and its not that hard to type (Ctrl Alt 4) I think the exchange rate would be equal to 0.10$ or 0.01$ Us.
Another thing, from all the chima rps I have read, everyone always wants to set a currency, and we should to. In other news, I am often here when like there is no staff for 12 hours, should I run for mod ?
I'm against a currency. RPing is what people do to relax, and escape from the real world. Currency makes it a bore, with people having to continually update documents whenever they spend any.
Another thing, from all the chima rps I have read, everyone always wants to set a currency, and we should to. In other news, I am often here when like there is no staff for 12 hours, should I run for mod ?
I'm against a currency. RPing is what people do to relax, and escape from the real world. Currency makes it a bore, with people having to continually update documents whenever they spend any.
You don't really, you can just spend like a rapper and no care. Coz no one will go broke.
Anyways lets have a vote then (Note this isn't deciding the currency its just saying whether we should or shouldn't) Options: Should we have a currency? 1) Yes 2) No
i agree with you then...
Sig by Sam
