In general, we wouldn't be bothering the resident of the Retired Themes too much. Besides, most of them are members. They don't have to join, and all the roleplays still there would remain.
We would not only rename the board, we would have the mods create a new subforum for each new roleplay we make.
There seems to be some confusion here. Retired Themes is for Retired Themes. I suggested that the group reboot the RPs in the Retired Themes section, not remake the Retired Themes section. The only RPs that go in Retired Themes are ones that belong with a retired LEGO theme.
In general, we wouldn't be bothering the resident of the Retired Themes too much. Besides, most of them are members. They don't have to join, and all the roleplays still there would remain.
We would not only rename the board, we would have the mods create a new subforum for each new roleplay we make.
There seems to be some confusion here. Retired Themes is for Retired Themes. I suggested that the group reboot the RPs in the Retired Themes section, not remake the Retired Themes section. The only RPs that go in Retired Themes are ones that belong with a retired LEGO theme.
There seems to be some confusion here. Retired Themes is for Retired Themes. I suggested that the group reboot the RPs in the Retired Themes section, not remake the Retired Themes section. The only RPs that go in Retired Themes are ones that belong with a retired LEGO theme.
How else can we create foreign RPs?
At this point in time, LMB Eternal is a LEGO forum, and so only hosts LEGO roleplays. This may change, but unless/until it does, only LEGO roleplays will be hosted here.
At this point in time, LMB Eternal is a LEGO forum, and so only hosts LEGO roleplays. This may change, but unless/until it does, only LEGO roleplays will be hosted here.
You could’ve said that before all the planning started.
In general, we wouldn't be bothering the resident of the Retired Themes too much. Besides, most of them are members. They don't have to join, and all the roleplays still there would remain.
We would not only rename the board, we would have the mods create a new subforum for each new roleplay we make.
There seems to be some confusion here. Retired Themes is for Retired Themes. I suggested that the group reboot the RPs in the Retired Themes section, not remake the Retired Themes section. The only RPs that go in Retired Themes are ones that belong with a retired LEGO theme.
Move Chima into Retired Themes. And Bionicle. Go on. I dare you. My point being the Retired Themes board is a joke, and should be abolished altogether. It was a nuisance then, during the LMBs, and is simply a dash of nostalgia for about six people now. I'm not saying delete the theme boards, just move them in with the rest.
There seems to be some confusion here. Retired Themes is for Retired Themes. I suggested that the group reboot the RPs in the Retired Themes section, not remake the Retired Themes section. The only RPs that go in Retired Themes are ones that belong with a retired LEGO theme.
Move Chima into Retired Themes. And Bionicle. Go on. I dare you. My point being the Retired Themes board is a joke, and should be abolished altogether. It was a nuisance then, during the LMBs, and is simply a dash of nostalgia for about six people now. I'm not saying delete the theme boards, just move them in with the rest.
The staff fully has the ability to add a new category. The retired themes don't take up that much space and just because they aren't used much doesn't mean they should be removed.
I say the staff should add a new category. It's only one more board, and doesn't take up a lot of space. By space, I'm talking about data storage on the server. It takes about 4 kilobytes to store a post.
Uh... LMBE is first, with remaking the Retired Themes into a new... being third. I`m confused.
I also get the impression that the Staff isn't necessarily okay with remaking our entire Retired Themes subforum into a RP board. Retired Themes is, well, for retired themes discussion in addition to retired themes RPs. Additional RP subforums can certainly be added though, just ask!
Or would it be possible to make a misc RP fourm or sub fourm? Just an Idea.
There seems to be some confusion here. Retired Themes is for Retired Themes. I suggested that the group reboot the RPs in the Retired Themes section, not remake the Retired Themes section. The only RPs that go in Retired Themes are ones that belong with a retired LEGO theme.
Move Chima into Retired Themes. And Bionicle. Go on. I dare you. My point being the Retired Themes board is a joke, and should be abolished altogether. It was a nuisance then, during the LMBs, and is simply a dash of nostalgia for about six people now. I'm not saying delete the theme boards, just move them in with the rest.
It was actually pretty darn active on the old LMBs.
Move Chima into Retired Themes. And Bionicle. Go on. I dare you. My point being the Retired Themes board is a joke, and should be abolished altogether. It was a nuisance then, during the LMBs, and is simply a dash of nostalgia for about six people now. I'm not saying delete the theme boards, just move them in with the rest.
The staff fully has the ability to add a new category. The retired themes don't take up that much space and just because they aren't used much doesn't mean they should be removed.
I say the staff should add a new category. It's only one more board, and doesn't take up a lot of space. By space, I'm talking about data storage on the server. It takes about 4 kilobytes to store a post.
True, but why not the Retired Themes? It is basically an RP forum anyway.
They don't have to join, and all the roleplays still there would remain. 
My point being the Retired Themes board is a joke, and should be abolished altogether. It was a nuisance then, during the LMBs, and is simply a dash of nostalgia for about six people now. I'm not saying delete the theme boards, just move them in with the rest. 
