Oh, it's actually quite close. Too bad I won't be able to greet you that day since before July 10 I'll be banned now from the computer and gadgets, and it's most likely I'll never get it back. What a loving god we have indeed, right?
Banned from computers forever? Why?
I really don't know. Even if there's no such thing as "forever" (let's just say 'till the end of time), you know how depressing that is. But hey, my life's been very depressing anyway (yes, I've been depressed for a really long time).
Not lucky. That'll mean my last time here (I think). But hey, there is no god that can stop my depression, so I just have to accept it and live with it.
Obviously because of your username. xD Yeah, the more it gets closer to its release, the more hype I get (not in Thor: Ragnarok's and Infinity War's case though, in a good way). xD Hear* Of course I did, and that's a great way to start the movie (it's gonna play when the MCU logo shows up) and it's gonna prove those "not-so memorable MCU music" dudes wrong (hope fully xD)!
I was actually confused with the tone it was going for. They mentioned before that it's going to have a dark tone and now, there'll be a lot of comedy. The Winter Soldier had some funny moments and yet it still had a serious tone. Still hyped for Thor: Ragnarok tho. And like what others said, it has a GOTG vibe (though for me, I got mostly a Star Wars feeling xP).
Martin Freeman? Michael B. Jordan (aka the famous retired basketball player recent Human Torch from that trainwreck reboot)? He's gonna be way better as Erik Killmonger than Human Torch! That has to happen in Infinity War and also a reference to the scene in The Desolation of Smaug where they first meet, and if they keep Klaw alive, a scene with him too. xD Sadly, the Wasp won't show up until Avengers 4, but the ultimate and complete Hobbit/LOTR reunion has to happen!
YES, that's exactly it. XD I agree. Same for TLJ. I'm already super hyped for that. And thanks for the spell check. I actually think that with the MCU logo was just a fan edit, and not confirmed to actually be the case, but it WOULD be really cool if they did do that. So I hope it's true. I also think the idea that MCU themes aren't good is bunk. There's a TON of great MCU themes.
Yeah, I think they probably planned for the dark tone before they hired Taika Waititi. He's mostly a comedy director, and said it was going to be pretty light shortly after he signed on. I'm actually kinda happy about it, though, because judging from the Thor-Darrell shorts, he's a very funny writer. XD And, yes, I agree. Same for Civil War. The loudest laughs I've ever heard in a theatre were in response to the jokes with Bucky and Falcon in CW. Ragnarok does look a bit SW-y in a way. I hadn't thought of that.
Yep. I didn't get to see him as Torch, but I'm pretty excited for him as Killmonger. He looks pretty awesome. PLUS he's sort of in every Ryan Coogler film, so you know Coogler's going to try and make a good role for him, which means we might get another good Marvel villain! That's so,etching we could definitely use. Also, can you believe Coogler's only 31?! Yes! And don't forget Betty Brant and Hela. And Red Skull. And Skurge. XD
Obviously that's exactly it. xD As for TLJ, I'm also megahyped for it. I just randomly put it in there, but you're welcome. It's already confirmed that they will do it. Eh, that video made the "not-so memorable MCU music" popular. I blame those guys for having to complain about everything.
Idk why, but I kinda feel hiring Taika Waititi was a little mistake because, like you said, they planned a darker approach for the movie, though we'll see how it'll turn out. Dear lord, I can't get over the Team Thor video. xD Yup, especially Civil War (the only scene with so much comedy was the Airport battle scene, but if you remove that entire scene or if you remove Ant-Man and Spidey and make Stark a bit more serious, there'll be very little comedy in it). In my theater that time, pretty much every jokes in the Airport battle scene. There were only few people laughing at other scenes in the movie. In other words, the audience was mostly silent. I guess you haven't thought of that because GOTG also had a Star Wars vibe.
Same. The problem was he was miscast as Human Torch. Literally every Ryan Coogler film?! Another good Marvel villain?! Shut up and take my money! I need to time travel now! Ooh, he's that young? He seems like a good director already at that age. Dagnabbit, I almost forgot Galadriel, Lord Elrond, and... did Karl Urban play an orc or did he play Gimli? xP Also, who did Betty Brant play again? xD
Ooh, interesting. All I knew is that you can play as the '66 Batman and I only knew more about that now!
There was? Then I'll just have to say Adam West's incarnation of Batman is more iconic than that one (I guess?). He and Heath Ledger must be having a great conversation together.
Yah, it's pretty fun. His level is a blast if you've seen the TV series.
Definitely. And don't forget a lot of other cast members from the '66 series, and Bob Kane and Bill Finger themselves!
I've only seen bits of the TV series most recently.
Wow, how could they not include them in The Lego Batman Movie?
YES AND I NEED TO KNOW NOW WHY IS IT SO POPULAR?! XDXD
(If it's popular for a good reason/purpose, I'll let it infect me. xD)
IDK! I tried someone's once, and it was just... Meh. I don't get it.
Same, I don't get its popularity either. All it does is spin. Wow! I'm totally amazed that this is my first time seeing something spin! Awesome!
(Disclaimer: I don't hate them at all in case you think I hate it like it's the worst thing ever made. It's just that, I don't get how it got so popular.)
I just found out now that the Marvel Studios intro for GOTG Vol. 2 is slightly altered.
Oh, wow, didn't notice.
Well, it's not that noticeable. The only difference is that you see more clips from previous MCU movies (such as that bit where Doctor Strange wears the Cloak of Levitation in particular).
*Sigh* where to start..? Rice, rice, meat, some rice... Okay, serious now: white rice makes up the bulk of my diet, so I can always expect a good ol' pot of rice for dinner, and aside from that fruit veg an' meat make up the bulk of my diet. My mum miraculously found an almond bread recipe, which is most likely the closest thing to normal bread I'll ever taste. Then there's almond milk (that's a life-saver) to which I could reacquaint myself with the foreign substance known as cereal. For a sweet snack I there's chocolate slice; equivalent to a chocolate cake that actually tastes nice along with almond cookies which, surprisingly, didn't need altering which means it's actually a "normal" biscuit. *Whew* sorry, I tend to go a little overboard with written descriptions.
I don't drink straight milk, so it's fine. I don't drink milk in cereal. So I honestly don't care about milk. Except in ice cream, cheese, and the other good stuff. And I like rice, although brown rice is better. You eat a lot of almonds. They're my favorite nut. Looks like you somehow find something to eat.
Well, the Bible even says that is is sufficient. Atheists don't even think like Christians do, so arguing with them is entirely different than how you would argue with another Christian.
I've heard lots of those philosophical arguments. I personally do not need solid proof, due to faith, but I see your point.
That's fair, as I said, but my statement was more in regard to faith-based arguments in general, not specifically Christian to Christian ones.
'I personally do not need solid proof, due to faith' is exactly the point I've been trying to make. Don't get me wrong, Faith without solid proof is a great thing, and there are like a bazillion bible quotes which say so, but at the same time, two people arguing when neither side is back by solid proof, and both are backed primarily by faith, will inevitably end in a draw. You can't prove something true if it has no proof behind it. My SECOND point was that you could have a PHILOSOPHICAL debate on it if you wanted to, though.
Interesting.
If a person has true faith in Scripture, I think that if they are properly shown in Scripture how they are wrong, it would work. But yes, the most important thing is a person's heart. Whether or not they are willing to change.
Whoever invented them is genius. It is my life goal to create something so addicting that they'll have to come up with a medical term for said addiction. Because it'll make soooooo much money.
It takes time for it to kick off. Fidget spinners were actually invented in the '90s.