Which is Better: Reading a book in 4 hours and not reading another book until it's done (or changing books in the middle and never finishing the first one) and end up reading 10-13 books a week, or reading a large number of books, multiple at at time?
Which is Better: Reading a book in 4 hours and not reading another book until it's done (or changing books in the middle and never finishing the first one) and end up reading 10-13 books a week, or reading a large number of books, multiple at at time?
Which is Better: Reading a book in 4 hours and not reading another book until it's done (or changing books in the middle and never finishing the first one) and end up reading 10-13 books a week, or reading a large number of books, multiple at at time?
'Cuz that first person is me.
Definitely the first one. The more books you read at a time, the harder it becomes to remember what's happening in each one.
Which is Better: Reading a book in 4 hours and not reading another book until it's done (or changing books in the middle and never finishing the first one) and end up reading 10-13 books a week, or reading a large number of books, multiple at at time?
'Cuz that first person is me.
Definitely the first one. The more books you read at a time, the harder it becomes to remember what's happening in each one.
I read more fanfiction than I do books, but with the amount that I read, it does become hard to keep track of what's what. It generally takes a coupla months between updates for most of the fics I've read, so by the time the next update has come around I forget what happened in the last one. Kinda sucks tbh...
