I am hoping to set up the HQ for a roleplay tribe, I was planing on the Vultures or Bats, however, both tribes are (according to LEGO) members of larger tribes (The Ice Hunters and Outlanders) so I wanted to know if we are allowed to use the old, pre-RP-reset style system for making HQs, because I personally think that if we keep those different tribes in smaller HQS, it will give roleplayers of different animals a bit more freedom for what to do, not to mention it will make bios much more organized.
I'll vote for number 2. But I suggest we let the HQs make their own decisions. An HQ driven RP that still follows certain canon guidelines. I suppose after we set up the RP we can discuss what we want those rules to be.
I am hoping to set up the HQ for a roleplay tribe, I was planing on the Vultures or Bats, however, both tribes are (according to LEGO) members of larger tribes (The Ice Hunters and Outlanders) so I wanted to know if we are allowed to use the old, pre-RP-reset style system for making HQs, because I personally think that if we keep those different tribes in smaller HQS, it will give roleplayers of different animals a bit more freedom for what to do, not to mention it will make bios much more organized.
We'll most likely cross those bridges when we come to them, but I have already called the Ice Bears so I guess you can call the Vultures or Bats. You can't have both though. I would like to have each HQ be separate from each other. So instead of "Ice Tribe HQ", I would like it to be broken up into each individual tribe. So like "Ice Bear HQ, Vulture HQ, Saber Toothe, and Mammoth HQ." Get my meaning? But for now, Chima is just dealing with the original tribes. At some point we should start discussing when to implement the Outlanders or set up a storyline to promote the Outlander's arrival. For now, you can take the Rhinos if you wish.
FYI, I think the polls have closed, so... you don't need to vote on those. However, we do need votes at the FAC to elect who is going to be a part of the FAC.
FYI, I think the polls have closed, so... you don't need to vote on those. However, we do need votes at the FAC to elect who is going to be a part of the FAC.
BTW, who were you on the LMBs?
JSYK, I would be willing to stand for election as an FAC Councillor.
FYI, I think the polls have closed, so... you don't need to vote on those. However, we do need votes at the FAC to elect who is going to be a part of the FAC.
BTW, who were you on the LMBs?
JSYK, I would be willing to stand for election as an FAC Councillor.
Alright. Post that at the FAC topic so people can see it.
I am hoping to set up the HQ for a roleplay tribe, I was planing on the Vultures or Bats, however, both tribes are (according to LEGO) members of larger tribes (The Ice Hunters and Outlanders) so I wanted to know if we are allowed to use the old, pre-RP-reset style system for making HQs, because I personally think that if we keep those different tribes in smaller HQS, it will give roleplayers of different animals a bit more freedom for what to do, not to mention it will make bios much more organized.
We'll most likely cross those bridges when we come to them, but I have already called the Ice Bears so I guess you can call the Vultures or Bats. You can't have both though. I would like to have each HQ be separate from each other. So instead of "Ice Tribe HQ", I would like it to be broken up into each individual tribe. So like "Ice Bear HQ, Vulture HQ, Saber Toothe, and Mammoth HQ." Get my meaning? But for now, Chima is just dealing with the original tribes. At some point we should start discussing when to implement the Outlanders or set up a storyline to promote the Outlander's arrival. For now, you can take the Rhinos if you wish.
I agree with the whole division thing 100% And i'll be ready to create the HQs when it's the right time. For now, I joined the ravens.
P.S are we allowed to have more than one character?
We'll most likely cross those bridges when we come to them, but I have already called the Ice Bears so I guess you can call the Vultures or Bats. You can't have both though. I would like to have each HQ be separate from each other. So instead of "Ice Tribe HQ", I would like it to be broken up into each individual tribe. So like "Ice Bear HQ, Vulture HQ, Saber Toothe, and Mammoth HQ." Get my meaning? But for now, Chima is just dealing with the original tribes. At some point we should start discussing when to implement the Outlanders or set up a storyline to promote the Outlander's arrival. For now, you can take the Rhinos if you wish.
I agree with the whole division thing 100% And i'll be ready to create the HQs when it's the right time. For now, I joined the ravens.
P.S are we allowed to have more than one character?
Yes, you can have more than one character. The limit is 3 characters total. One must be stronger than the other two. This is your Roleplaying Character (RPC). Your other two characters are weaker than all RPCs and are strong than all NPCs. You could easily create the Rhinos and make that character your RPC and have the raven be the subordinate character. Or vice versa.
I am hoping to set up the HQ for a roleplay tribe, I was planing on the Vultures or Bats, however, both tribes are (according to LEGO) members of larger tribes (The Ice Hunters and Outlanders) so I wanted to know if we are allowed to use the old, pre-RP-reset style system for making HQs, because I personally think that if we keep those different tribes in smaller HQS, it will give roleplayers of different animals a bit more freedom for what to do, not to mention it will make bios much more organized.
I fully agree. I didn't like how "fire tribes" and "ice tribes" were lumped together rather than having individual HQ's.
Sig by Sam
Just post a bio and apply for the HQ. ![[y]](http://storage.proboards.com/6672327/images/WYWPH2VRo26pOFDid7QZ.png)