If it's just your opinion, why are you rubbing "Chima is the best" into everyone's faces like fact?
What are you talking about? I never said Chima was the best, and I didn't rub anything into anyone's face. If you're talking about the Fabuland chatroom, I was just using evidence from the show to explain that the villains have motivations.
First, you didn't use any evidence. All you said was:
"Well, IDK, because the characters weren't poorly done and the villains motivations weren't lacking? "
That has no evidence behind it.
Second, you kept telling everyone that Chima was a great theme, and that Fabuland was terrible, even though that was just your opinion.
In short, opinion is not fact.
Third, yes, I was talking about the Fabuland chatroom.
Now let's get back on topic. The last thing we want is for this topic to be locked.
What are you talking about? I never said Chima was the best, and I didn't rub anything into anyone's face. If you're talking about the Fabuland chatroom, I was just using evidence from the show to explain that the villains have motivations.
First, you didn't use any evidence. All you said was:
"Well, IDK, because the characters weren't poorly done and the villains motivations weren't lacking? "
That has no evidence behind it.
Second, you kept telling everyone that Chima was a great theme, and that Fabuland was terrible, even though that was just your opinion.
In short, opinion is not fact.
Third, yes, I was talking about the Fabuland chatroom.
Now let's get back on topic. The last thing we want is for this topic to be locked.
First, have you read my latest posts in that topic? I did give evidence.
Second, I was saying that because people kept saying Chima was bad and fabuland was good. That was just their opinions as well.
OK, now that I've cleared that up, let's get back on topic.
First, have you read my latest posts in that topic? I did give evidence.
Second, I was saying that because people kept saying Chima was bad and fabuland was good. That was just their opinions as well.
OK, now that I've cleared that up, let's get back on topic.
2. If it's just their opinions, why are you trying to change said opinions? And don't say I'm the one trying to change your opinion. You said:
"CHIMA WAS NOT HORRIBLE. IT IS LITERALLY ONE OF THE GREATEST LEGO THEMES OF ALL TIME. FABULAND IS THE WORST THEME EVER."
If you actually respected what other people thought, you would not have said that.
I stand corrected. NOW we can get back on topic. Let's talk about this in the Fabuland chatroom.
I wasn't trying to change their opinions. I was arguing with them. That's how opinions work. You can't argue with a fact, but you can argue with an opinion if it differs from yours. If people have different opinions from each other, they will argue. I wasn't shoving anything in their faces any more than they were shoving anything in mine. We disagreed with each other, so we argued a little, and now we're not arguing anymore. I'm finished talking about this. [a]
Back on topic, I bet if the Overlord ruled Ninjago, the canon would be completely ruined.
Can we just agree to disagree on Ninjago v.s. Chima? I'd like this to get back on topic.
Don't worry, I'm dealing with it. Or at least, I'm trying to.
Umm, what? You were the one who brought that up on this topic in the first place. Anyway, it doesn't matter now, because the discussion is finished on both topics. [a]
Don't worry, I'm dealing with it. Or at least, I'm trying to.
Umm, what? You were the one who brought that up on this topic in the first place. Anyway, it doesn't matter now, because the discussion is finished on both topics. [a]
2. If it's just their opinions, why are you trying to change said opinions? And don't say I'm the one trying to change your opinion. You said:
"CHIMA WAS NOT HORRIBLE. IT IS LITERALLY ONE OF THE GREATEST LEGO THEMES OF ALL TIME. FABULAND IS THE WORST THEME EVER."
If you actually respected what other people thought, you would not have said that.
I stand corrected. NOW we can get back on topic. Let's talk about this in the Fabuland chatroom.
I wasn't trying to change their opinions. I was arguing with them. That's how opinions work. You can't argue with a fact, but you can argue with an opinion if it differs from yours. If people have different opinions from each other, they will argue. I wasn't shoving anything in their faces any more than they were shoving anything in mine. We disagreed with each other, so we argued a little, and now we're not arguing anymore. I'm finished talking about this. [a]
Back on topic, I bet if the Overlord ruled Ninjago, the canon would be completely ruined.
Wow. Now that...makes no sense. You're arguing against the opinions of others but you aren't trying to change their opinions? I don't get it.
I wasn't trying to change their opinions. I was arguing with them. That's how opinions work. You can't argue with a fact, but you can argue with an opinion if it differs from yours. If people have different opinions from each other, they will argue. I wasn't shoving anything in their faces any more than they were shoving anything in mine. We disagreed with each other, so we argued a little, and now we're not arguing anymore. I'm finished talking about this. [a]
Back on topic, I bet if the Overlord ruled Ninjago, the canon would be completely ruined.
Wow. Now that...makes no sense. You're arguing against the opinions of others but you aren't trying to change their opinions? I don't get it.
2. If it's just their opinions, why are you trying to change said opinions? And don't say I'm the one trying to change your opinion. You said:
"CHIMA WAS NOT HORRIBLE. IT IS LITERALLY ONE OF THE GREATEST LEGO THEMES OF ALL TIME. FABULAND IS THE WORST THEME EVER."
If you actually respected what other people thought, you would not have said that.
I stand corrected. NOW we can get back on topic. Let's talk about this in the Fabuland chatroom.
I wasn't trying to change their opinions. I was arguing with them. That's how opinions work. You can't argue with a fact, but you can argue with an opinion if it differs from yours. If people have different opinions from each other, they will argue. I wasn't shoving anything in their faces any more than they were shoving anything in mine. We disagreed with each other, so we argued a little, and now we're not arguing anymore. I'm finished talking about this. [a]
Back on topic, I bet if the Overlord ruled Ninjago, the canon would be completely ruined.
I wasn't trying to change their opinions. I was arguing with them. That's how opinions work. You can't argue with a fact, but you can argue with an opinion if it differs from yours. If people have different opinions from each other, they will argue. I wasn't shoving anything in their faces any more than they were shoving anything in mine. We disagreed with each other, so we argued a little, and now we're not arguing anymore. I'm finished talking about this. [a]
Back on topic, I bet if the Overlord ruled Ninjago, the canon would be completely ruined.
Wow. Now that...makes no sense. You're arguing against the opinions of others but you aren't trying to change their opinions? I don't get it.
Well first of all, that was quite a while ago and my arguments with those people were very brief. Second of all, by that logic, anytime anyone argues, they're trying to change people's opinions? That makes no sense. People just argue when they disagree. It's a natural instinct of humans.
Anyway, I think that Pythor could've betrayed the Overlord in Season 3. I wonder how that would've turned out.
I wasn't trying to change their opinions. I was arguing with them. That's how opinions work. You can't argue with a fact, but you can argue with an opinion if it differs from yours. If people have different opinions from each other, they will argue. I wasn't shoving anything in their faces any more than they were shoving anything in mine. We disagreed with each other, so we argued a little, and now we're not arguing anymore. I'm finished talking about this. [a]
Back on topic, I bet if the Overlord ruled Ninjago, the canon would be completely ruined.
That one's pretty obvious though.
Yeah, but I couldn't think of anything else that would destroy/change the canon.
Unless of course..... Kai and Nya's parents never met? With Kai never existing, would that cause Lloyd to be smashed in episode 10 and not become the green ninja? Or would there somehow be another fire ninja to save him?
Yeah, but I couldn't think of anything else that would destroy/change the canon.
Unless of course..... Kai and Nya's parents never met? With Kai never existing, would that cause Lloyd to be smashed in episode 10 and not become the green ninja? Or would there somehow be another fire ninja to save him?
Then again, then Kai wouldn't cause Lloyd to be in that situation.
Yeah, but I couldn't think of anything else that would destroy/change the canon.
Unless of course..... Kai and Nya's parents never met? With Kai never existing, would that cause Lloyd to be smashed in episode 10 and not become the green ninja? Or would there somehow be another fire ninja to save him?
Then again, then Kai wouldn't cause Lloyd to be in that situation.
That's right, I guess Kai taking out his Sword of Fire at the Fire Temple caused a chain reaction that made the Serpentine drop Lloyd's cage into the lava.
I never said Chima was the best, and I didn't rub anything into anyone's face. If you're talking about the Fabuland chatroom, I was just using evidence from the show to explain that the villains have motivations.
