Were to celebrate those days everyday, we don't need a holiday, besides that's church and state again, but We are to celebrate Christ's Resurrection everyday.
Yes, but there's nothing wrong with having a day set apart once a year to celebrate with your friends and family in a special way.
Not when its a Official Law for Countries, its not in the Bible, and what its based off.
Might I mention the office of Priest is obsolete and wrong. Theotokos is God Bearer, saying that Mary is the Bearer of God, a serious error. I think you're getting the KJV and the NKJV confused. Think about it, Holy is without Sin, Nothing on earth or anyone but God is Holy, so everything else is non-holy, with which means WITH Sin, Sin is evil and therefore everything is Evil, Including Us, Now Christ made a way for us to live but we are still evil and sinning.
We still sin, but we are not evil because we are made righteous through Christ. Holy does not mean sinless, it means set apart, we are holy because we are set apart by God to fulfill His plans.
But Holy is without Sin, we have sin, were evil and we continue to sin, were evil. I am, you are no one isn't.
But have you challenged a thing he said, or did you just come for advice?
I have not personally challenged them, but I know that others have challenged them. One of them, by the way, serves on an international council for cloning ethics. Do you think he might be opposed by some of the scientific community for his positions on cloning? And yet he still talks with them on friendly terms.
But does that person say he is wrong and attacks him?
Might I mention the office of Priest is obsolete and wrong. Theotokos is God Bearer, saying that Mary is the Bearer of God, a serious error. I think you're getting the KJV and the NKJV confused. Think about it, Holy is without Sin, Nothing on earth or anyone but God is Holy, so everything else is non-holy, with which means WITH Sin, Sin is evil and therefore everything is Evil, Including Us, Now Christ made a way for us to live but we are still evil and sinning.
Wrong may be your opinion, but how is it obsolete?
She... did bear Jesus in her womb. Jesus being God, this seems like an accurate statement? Unless you somehow think she didn't give birth to Christ.
Oh, I apologize. The NKJV was the newer, further revised version. My mistake.
Okay, so while "holiness" may equate "sinless" (it doesn't always), "not holy" may equate "it has sin." Everything has sin, but that doesn't make everything evil. Evil: "arising from actual or imputed bad character or conduct;" "morally reprehensible." We may have sin, but that doesn't mean that everything is actively trying to do bad things. We're not perfect, but we're not Satan.
The Office of Priest is in the Old Testament, that's been fulfilled, Christ is are New Priest. But the term is wrong, no one can "bear God" we can't understand everything but that turns down a bad path. Okay, are you still attacking it? But Sin is Evil, so we are Evil, we don't want to be but so is the world.
In the late 1700s-early 1800s, Spain controlled New Orleans, the mouth of the Mississippi River and the source for much of Kentucky's commerce. The Kingdom of Spain had closed the New Orleans ports for political reasons and Secretary of State Jefferson intended to repair good relations with the King of Spain even at the cost of Kentucky's economy by allowing this. Governor Isaac Shelby wrote a series of correspondences to Jefferson, iterating that Jefferson represented the American people and their interests and not the interests of the King of Spain, and that if Jefferson would continue to value the interests of Spain over those of his people, Shelby would use his own means to reopen the harbor. President Washington acquired American rights to shipping in New Orleans soon after.
...you have the coolest family ever
Eh, I'm glad you like it. XD
✠✙ What once was old doth fade away/But Former Glory stays the same ✙✠ •••Unity•••Duty•••DESTINY••• ***EST. 2006*** • 9/11/01 • BCC: 2010-2014 • EX-TER-MIN-ATE! –Dalek
Yes, but there's nothing wrong with having a day set apart once a year to celebrate with your friends and family in a special way.
Not when its a Official Law for Countries, its not in the Bible, and what its based off.
It's not the law that you must take a day off on Christmas. Again: just because the Bible doesn't mandate it doesn't mean it's evil. The Bible doesn't require you to brush your teeth, either!
✠✙ What once was old doth fade away/But Former Glory stays the same ✙✠ •••Unity•••Duty•••DESTINY••• ***EST. 2006*** • 9/11/01 • BCC: 2010-2014 • EX-TER-MIN-ATE! –Dalek
I have not personally challenged them, but I know that others have challenged them. One of them, by the way, serves on an international council for cloning ethics. Do you think he might be opposed by some of the scientific community for his positions on cloning? And yet he still talks with them on friendly terms.
But does that person say he is wrong and attacks him?
Often, yes. But if someone attacks you, do you not have the right to bow out of the conversation and stop speaking to him?
✠✙ What once was old doth fade away/But Former Glory stays the same ✙✠ •••Unity•••Duty•••DESTINY••• ***EST. 2006*** • 9/11/01 • BCC: 2010-2014 • EX-TER-MIN-ATE! –Dalek
Wrong may be your opinion, but how is it obsolete?
She... did bear Jesus in her womb. Jesus being God, this seems like an accurate statement? Unless you somehow think she didn't give birth to Christ.
Oh, I apologize. The NKJV was the newer, further revised version. My mistake.
Okay, so while "holiness" may equate "sinless" (it doesn't always), "not holy" may equate "it has sin." Everything has sin, but that doesn't make everything evil. Evil: "arising from actual or imputed bad character or conduct;" "morally reprehensible." We may have sin, but that doesn't mean that everything is actively trying to do bad things. We're not perfect, but we're not Satan.
The Office of Priest is in the Old Testament, that's been fulfilled, Christ is are New Priest. But the term is wrong, no one can "bear God" we can't understand everything but that turns down a bad path. Okay, are you still attacking it? But Sin is Evil, so we are Evil, we don't want to be but so is the world.
While the Bible does not say that specifically, I can understand your reasoning.
To bear: "to bring forth (young); give birth to." Mary gave birth to Jesus, so yes, she bore God. Due to the nature of the Trinity, that doesn't mean she created God -- it just means that she bore his incarnation.
I'm not attacking anything, but I'm bringing to light fallacy in your argument.
We have sin, and we have evil, but we also have the Holy Spirit, and the Holy Spirit is the ultimate good, so we are either good or evil depending on which one we allow to control us.
✠✙ What once was old doth fade away/But Former Glory stays the same ✙✠ •••Unity•••Duty•••DESTINY••• ***EST. 2006*** • 9/11/01 • BCC: 2010-2014 • EX-TER-MIN-ATE! –Dalek
✠✙ What once was old doth fade away/But Former Glory stays the same ✙✠ •••Unity•••Duty•••DESTINY••• ***EST. 2006*** • 9/11/01 • BCC: 2010-2014 • EX-TER-MIN-ATE! –Dalek
I have the KJV. It's weird when haters quote their Bible and I'm like "what". Some have huge differences. They don't really change the meaning, more make the meaning more forceful than it previously was. It actually makes it darker.
That's Interesting. Which versions, for instance?
I'm not really being sarcastic, by the way, I mean it, I'm interesting. Obviously there are some "translations" that are actually just paraphrases(The Message. grr. ), and some that dumb it down to the point of stupidity (I'm looking at you, Living Bible.)
But I haven't encountered any that have made it darker, so I was wondering which you meant.
You mean the version I have or the version of said others? The "haters" usually post quotes of their Bible online without reference to which version it is.
To be honest... I'm not sure which version mine is. All I know is it's a KJV, ironically aimed at Catholics, only Catholics are generally against the KJV. I'll let you know when I get home... I suppose.
IMO, the USSR wasn't the most evil country ever, because they were on the good side during WWII.
That's incredibly debatable, since they continually attacked Allied resistance forces and deliberately hindered Allied movements for their own interest. It's a "the enemy of my enemy..." situation, except that he's still going to be your enemy after the war ends.
That is true, but Nazi Germany, Cambodia under the Khmer Rouge, and a few others were way worse.
Except there were a lot of religions before it, e.g. the Sumerian religion.
Adam's conversational relationship with God would include the first words ever spoken by a human being, so I don't think any religion could predate it. :tounge:
Except it wasn't really a religion until someone created the Torah, which wasn't until about 2000 BCE.
), and some that dumb it down to the point of stupidity (I'm looking at you, Living Bible.)