Ah, only laser blasts and energy shields? Well that hardly raises the need for things like tomes and titles like "witch", as those imply a variety of different sorts of magical powers. Simply allowing laser blasts and energy shields is actually far more desirable than borderline superpower spells, as it keeps it simple while making it so that those who practice that power just don't need to carry weapons and shields on them.
It looks like I've overreacted, as the use of words like tomes and witches made me think full-on magic was going to be practiced. My bad.
Spider Witches use 'potion' like substances to achieve various effects, but it's simply fancy botany at best, with a bit of mystic like qualities.
Tome = Book Spells exist.. I actually don't want what I submitted to be mistaken for simple energy shields or laser blasts.
Usually a scholarly book, often associated with sorcery and the like in fiction.
Looks to me like you may need a second run through the FAC. Weird how no-one picked up on the type of magic you intended.
Can everyone (egorsmirnovFelipeDutraShamrockKeiththelegokidOmega_Tahuthepegleggedninja ) stop assuming how MY magic works? The magic I wrote extensive rules about and just general information about? If anyone should be explaining how it works, it should be me. After all, I'm the one who made this magic. If someone is using their own type of magic, I'm going to flat our say it: Bring it up to a vote of your own. Don't lump it with my magic.
Explosive Magic, for example, would not be feasible under the way MY magic works. Don't I get a say in the magic that I single-handedly made?
Well well well... what an interesting development...
Ah, only laser blasts and energy shields? Well that hardly raises the need for things like tomes and titles like "witch", as those imply a variety of different sorts of magical powers. Simply allowing laser blasts and energy shields is actually far more desirable than borderline superpower spells, as it keeps it simple while making it so that those who practice that power just don't need to carry weapons and shields on them.
It looks like I've overreacted, as the use of words like tomes and witches made me think full-on magic was going to be practiced. My bad.
That's the only magic we have approved so far, yes.
I mean, with the way Shamrock is suggesting magic works, is just a manipulation of Chi. All magic would be done the using the same power source, and the biggest difference between characters is how they manipulate it.
And if your magic is more than just simple energy blasts, shields, or healing, then it needs to be passed by the FAC. And from what you've said, it seems to me that it's a lot more than that.
*sighs*
I've put most of it through. I'm not putting the Potions through because, hey, I haven't actually used a potion yet.
Then no, you cannot use that against the Ice Hunters. Only weapons powered by orbs of fire chi can do anything against the Ice Hunters.
I have to disagree. Just because they have magic shenanigans doesn't mean that they are exempt from the laws of logic and physics. They will to find other ways to counter them.
Well, I think we should stop any fleet from reaching more than one hundred capital ships of a each model.
A hundreas is too much, we are talking about Capital ships, not screens, or cruisers or subs - Capital ships - Battleships and Aircraft Carrier no navy should have over 12 of either, the fact that theres a navy of over 26 aircraft carriers and 21 battleships is broken, the many thing about capital ships is that they take time, and need to be supported.
Oops. Well back in the old days of the RP (2017), everyone else seemed to be making 20+ of each kind of ship, so I thought that was the standard amount.
Can everyone (egorsmirnovFelipeDutraShamrockKeiththelegokidOmega_Tahuthepegleggedninja ) stop assuming how MY magic works? The magic I wrote extensive rules about and just general information about? If anyone should be explaining how it works, it should be me. After all, I'm the one who made this magic. If someone is using their own type of magic, I'm going to flat our say it: Bring it up to a vote of your own. Don't lump it with my magic.
Explosive Magic, for example, would not be feasible under the way MY magic works. Don't I get a say in the magic that I single-handedly made?
In that case, would you be able to submit these extensive rules to the FAC?
Shamrock, I saw you liked the post on limiting Capital ships, but the FAC has not reached a conclusion or progressed on this topic, can you comment your thoughts on the situation?
You liking this post only shows me that you support limiting, and that you've seen this post Should the limit be 10 per type per capital ship? I.e. 10 battleships and 10 aircraft carriers? Or 20 or 30 or 5 I need other peoples openions.
Sorry, I keep getting called away every time I try to respond to this. I'd say 10 aircraft carriers, more battleships, et cetera.
Can everyone (egorsmirnovFelipeDutraShamrockKeiththelegokidOmega_Tahuthepegleggedninja ) stop assuming how MY magic works? The magic I wrote extensive rules about and just general information about? If anyone should be explaining how it works, it should be me. After all, I'm the one who made this magic. If someone is using their own type of magic, I'm going to flat our say it: Bring it up to a vote of your own. Don't lump it with my magic.
Explosive Magic, for example, would not be feasible under the way MY magic works. Don't I get a say in the magic that I single-handedly made?
In that case, would you be able to submit these extensive rules to the FAC?
Can everyone (egorsmirnovFelipeDutraShamrockKeiththelegokidOmega_Tahuthepegleggedninja ) stop assuming how MY magic works? The magic I wrote extensive rules about and just general information about? If anyone should be explaining how it works, it should be me. After all, I'm the one who made this magic. If someone is using their own type of magic, I'm going to flat our say it: Bring it up to a vote of your own. Don't lump it with my magic.
Explosive Magic, for example, would not be feasible under the way MY magic works. Don't I get a say in the magic that I single-handedly made?
Your Magic is actually magic though isn't it? Not some Chi channeling.
I simply made a device that nulls all forms of magic. If you are calling your magic "magic" then it should work on your magic.
You liking this post only shows me that you support limiting, and that you've seen this post Should the limit be 10 per type per capital ship? I.e. 10 battleships and 10 aircraft carriers? Or 20 or 30 or 5 I need other peoples openions.
Sorry, I keep getting called away every time I try to respond to this. I'd say 10 aircraft carriers, more battleships, et cetera.
Allright 10 aircraft carriers and 15 battleships, per tribal navy.
I have to disagree. Just because they have magic shenanigans doesn't mean that they are exempt from the laws of logic and physics. They will to find other ways to counter them.
That makes fire chi completely pointless.
Yeah, i want it to be a secondary source to make it seem obscure for science to take over and kick its butt. FREEMAN GONNA KNOCK DA SCIENCE OUTTA EVERYTHING!!!
Can everyone (egorsmirnovFelipeDutraShamrockKeiththelegokidOmega_Tahuthepegleggedninja ) stop assuming how MY magic works? The magic I wrote extensive rules about and just general information about? If anyone should be explaining how it works, it should be me. After all, I'm the one who made this magic. If someone is using their own type of magic, I'm going to flat our say it: Bring it up to a vote of your own. Don't lump it with my magic.
Explosive Magic, for example, would not be feasible under the way MY magic works. Don't I get a say in the magic that I single-handedly made?
Your Magic is actually magic though isn't it? Not some Chi channeling.
I simply made a device that nulls all forms of magic. If you are calling your magic "magic" then it should work on your magic.
I’ll wait for a more concrete approval for the chi based explosion magic before using it in action, but would it be safe to fully use the Konuba Mecha? Shamrock approved, and the other three FAC members have yet to comment.
Original application on Page 66, updated on Page 72.
I have to disagree. Just because they have magic shenanigans doesn't mean that they are exempt from the laws of logic and physics. They will to find other ways to counter them.
That makes fire chi completely pointless.
Fire Chi can still be used for the Illumination. Don't try to stick so close to the contrived and plot-convenient shortcomings of the TV show, dude. There are already multiple ways that the southern tribes can put the hurt on the Ice Hunters.
Well back in the old days of the RP (2017), everyone else seemed to be making 20+ of each kind of ship, so I thought that was the standard amount. 
Should the limit be 10 per type per capital ship? I.e. 10 battleships and 10 aircraft carriers? Or 20 or 30 or 5 I need other peoples openions.
I'd say 10 aircraft carriers, more battleships, et cetera. 
