That would proceed to be a profoundly judicious asseveration, had the proclamation not persist to elect a composition contrary to my conviction.
I mean... the nature of the asseveration relative to your conviction doesn't preclude its judiciousness: depending on whether your conviction is objectively veracious, and therefore on the prowess of your skills and the efficacy of your strategies, the asseveration may, or may not, prove to be either profound or judicious.
Also, you've got a tense issue there: "That would proceed to be" is in the conditional future, but "had the proclamation not persist" is in both the conditional past and present, I think. The sentence should read: "That would be a profoundly judicious asseveration if the proclamation did not persist to elect a composition contrary to my conviction." If you wanted to keep it in past tense, you would want: "That would have been a profoundly judicious asseveration, had the proclamation not persisted to elect a composition contrary to my conviction." =P
Your skill with words far surpasses mine. I salute you, sir.
Here, take this emote for your excellent word-ing-ness. Use it, and be content -
Anyways, what is your view on rescaling the ranks?
I mean... the nature of the asseveration relative to your conviction doesn't preclude its judiciousness: depending on whether your conviction is objectively veracious, and therefore on the prowess of your skills and the efficacy of your strategies, the asseveration may, or may not, prove to be either profound or judicious.
Also, you've got a tense issue there: "That would proceed to be" is in the conditional future, but "had the proclamation not persist" is in both the conditional past and present, I think. The sentence should read: "That would be a profoundly judicious asseveration if the proclamation did not persist to elect a composition contrary to my conviction." If you wanted to keep it in past tense, you would want: "That would have been a profoundly judicious asseveration, had the proclamation not persisted to elect a composition contrary to my conviction." =P
Your skill with words far surpasses mine. I salute you, sir.
Here, take this emote for your excellent word-ing-ness. Use it, and be content -
Anyways, what is your view on rescaling the ranks?
You're very eloquent yourself. To be honest, I didn't even know the word "asseveration" before you used it, so thank you. I'd give you a salute, too, but I'm not sure how. =P
I don't have a view on rescaling the ranks. I'm more for making the rank names less ironic. =P
Your skill with words far surpasses mine. I salute you, sir.
Here, take this emote for your excellent word-ing-ness. Use it, and be content -
Anyways, what is your view on rescaling the ranks?
You're very eloquent yourself. To be honest, I didn't even know the word "asseveration" before you used it, so thank you. I'd give you a salute, too, but I'm not sure how. =P
I don't have a view on rescaling the ranks. I'm more for making the rank names less ironic. =P
I didn't know a bunch of those words which you so adequately addressed.
Just right-click on one of my emotes, click ''copy image address'', then paste the address in the ''insert image'' box, here on the BB's.
Your skill with words far surpasses mine. I salute you, sir.
Here, take this emote for your excellent word-ing-ness. Use it, and be content -
Anyways, what is your view on rescaling the ranks?
You're very eloquent yourself. To be honest, I didn't even know the word "asseveration" before you used it, so thank you. I'd give you a salute, too, but I'm not sure how. =P
I don't have a view on rescaling the ranks. I'm more for making the rank names less ironic. =P
You're very eloquent yourself. To be honest, I didn't even know the word "asseveration" before you used it, so thank you. I'd give you a salute, too, but I'm not sure how. =P
I don't have a view on rescaling the ranks. I'm more for making the rank names less ironic. =P
The same reason it was kept secret on the old MBs.
...but the ranks here only require POSTS, so it's not hard to figure it out...
True except some ranks only have one user in them (and some have zero). You really can only figure it out by watching your own ranking, just like people did on the old boards. (But yes it's waaay easier to figure out lol)
-last edited on Jul 15, 2020 13:44:47 GMT by Z-Whales
Post by Z-Whales on Jul 15, 2020 13:44:07 GMT
I was tagged here, so I looked at the petition. I kind of see where you're coming from, but also I don't really care one way or the other. So I guess I'll sign and then unsign for balance.
...but the ranks here only require POSTS, so it's not hard to figure it out...
True except some ranks only have one user in them (and some have zero). You really can only figure it out by watching your own ranking, just like people did on the old boards. (But yes it's waaay easier to figure out lol)
....considering the mb reqs are posted publicly and these are clearly the same...
So I guess I'll sign and then unsign for balance. 